Return
to [Genetics]
[Cellular Biology] [Ecology]
[Anatomy] [Botany]
[Ornithology] [APBiology]
[Evolution]
|
Standards for Term Papers III. Requirements and Standards A. Title Page |
|
I. Introduction Each of you will find yourself writing for various purposes and audiences. Each writing task will entail an expected form (sales report, scientific paper, literary essay), an anticipated audience (co-workers, boss, customer, professional peers, editors), and a required set of stylistic standards. Every editor and publication has specific style requirements. These requirements will seldom be the same for any two jobs. The style I ask you to use here is based on the CBE (CSE) Council of Biological Editors (renamed Council of Scientific Editors) style manual, often used for submitting articles to biological journals. The purpose of these rules is to help you develop standards of excellence in the organization and presentation of technical prose, and to teach you to conforming to a prescribed standard, as you will have to do throughout your life with each new writing task . |
|
II. The Assignment The term paper is an original report on your chosen or assigned research topic. This report will
|
|
III. Requirements and Standards |
|
A. Title Page The title page is not part of the assigned page count. Students are allowed some latitude on the title page as to the style and size of the font. The title page should include
COMMON PROBLEMS AND ERRORS FOR TITLE PAGES Missing information (not giving your name, not identifying the course for which the paper was written, not identifying the term and date of submission. |
|
B. Abstract The abstract is not part of the assigned page count. An abstract is a one-page summary of the information in the report or paper. The abstract should begin with the title of the paper. An abstract is a boiled-down version of the entire paper in 100-300 words. A good abstract is not the same as an introduction. A good abstract delivers the rationale, method, main facts and important conclusions of the paper in concise form. |
|
AN EXAMPLE
OF AN ABSTRACT
Insect-plant Relationships of the Insectivorous Pitcher Plant Sarracenia minor.
Eighty plants of Sarracenia minor Walt. from Alachua County, Florida, were examined for insect prey and living insect associates. Leaf damage by the noctuid moth Exyra semicrocea (Guenee) had rendered two-thirdsof the leaves non-functional and young larvae were present in 22.5% of the remaining functional leaves. larvae f the sarcophagid Blaexoxipha jonesi (Aldritch) wree present in 64% of the functional leaves and were estimated to consume as much as 50% of the insect prey captured by the leaves. Nests of the sphecid wasp Isodontia Mexicana (Saussure) prevented insect cature in an additional 2.5% of the functional leaves. Over 90% of the insecs captured by the leaves were ants, indicating that S. minor may be specialized in securing it's insect prey. |
|
COMMON PROBLEMS AND ERRORS FOR ABSTRACTS Not including the title on the abstract page. Using the abstract as the introduction of the paper. Writing in generalizations and not including all important specific information in the abstract. Introducing facts or conclusions in the abstract that you did not deal with in the paper itself. |
| C
. The Body of the Paper
These pages make up the assigned page count.
COMMON PROBLEMS
AND ERRORS FOR TEXT
Incorrect margins and spacing. Not paying attention to basic good writing skills: confused organization, poorly constructed paragraphs. Not properly citing sources for each and every fact and idea not your own original work...see Plagiarism. In a research report, mixing content between the sections, for example introducing new facts in the discussion section instead of giving them in the results section. Failure to adequately state the justification and background information for your pape in the introduction. Avoidance of the intellectual task at hand--collecting a bunch of data or facts then not using them or discussing them. Awkward appearance due to poor page control--not using appropriate pagination. |
|
D. Figures and Tables Figures and tables are not part of the page count. A figure can be a chart, graph, photograph, or other graphic illustration of your results. A table is a listing of your data, usually organized in columns and rows.
See the example below: |
|
Example of a figure: (1" margin, top, bottom, and sides)
![]() The illustration or graph is centered in the upper portion of the page.
Every figure must have a caption. The caption of a figure should be at the bottom of the page. It should make plain to the reader the significance of the figure to the subject of the report. A). Items of interest can be lettered or numbered. B). Any such items should be keyed or listed in the caption. C). Such items should relate directly and clearly to the concerns of the text. If the figure is not original to you, i.e. traced or re-drawn from an original source, that source should be cited here in the caption and included in the literature cited section of the paper (Drawn from Smith 1960, page 25).
|
|
Example of a table: TABLE 1--A TABLE MUST HAVE A TABLE NUMBER AND A CAPTION The caption of a table should be at the top of the page. It should make plain to the reader the significance of the table to the subject of the report. A). Items of interest can be lettered or numbered using superscripts within the table. B.) Any such items should be keyed or listed in the caption. C). Such items should relate directly and clearly to the concerns of the text. If the table is not original to you, the source should be cited here in the caption and included in the literature cited section of the paper (Smith 1960).
|
|
COMMON PROBLEMS
AND ERRORS FOR FIGURES AND TABLES
Not following the required format. Including tables or figures that don't clearly support and clarify the text. Relying on tables and figures to introduce facts which are not reported in the text of the paper. Not including references to your tables and figures in appropriate places in the text of the paper. Not including a source citation in the caption. Not supplying a caption, figure number, figure title. Not listing the source of your table or figure in the Literature Cited section of the paper. |
The Literature Cited Section-- must have at least 5 entries. This is a minimum, not a maximum. must have a heading: LITERATURE CITED must include both books and journal articles. may not include internet sources or general reference works such as encyclopedias and biology textbooks, except as sources for your figure. Specialized references for the specific topic under review are acceptable: for example, a microbiology bibliography may include Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Part of the grading of this section will be on the quality and appropriateness of the citations. Citations of scholarly journals are preferable to citations of un-refereed general interest magazines such as National Geographic and Audubon. Entries will be single spaced and in alphabetical order by first author's surname. Entries will have a hanging indent: This means that the first line of each entry will not be indented, but all subsequent lines in the entry will be indented 5 spaces. There will be a double space between the entries.
|
|
Example of a Literature
Cited: LITERATURE CITED Gould, S. J. 1995. Dinosaur in a Haystack-Reflections
in Natural History. Harmony Jones, H. and N. S. Smith. 1989. Hard Times
in Mobile, Fifth Ed. Worth Publishers, Inc. Maisie, J. D. 2003. The Effect of Gamma Rays
on Man-In-The-Moon Marigolds. Gonzo Schwaegerle, K.E. and B. A. Schaal. 1979. Genetic
Variability and Founder Effect in the Slobodkin, L.B. 1975. Ecological Energy Relationships
at the Population Level. In: Xerces, F. X. and D. L. Lawrence. 2003. An Illustration
of the Principle of Heavier-Than- |
|
COMMON PROBLEMS AND ERRORS FOR THE LITERATURE CITED Citing and using sources in the text of the paper that are not included in the literature cited section. Including sources in the literature cited section that are not used or cited in the text of the paper. Poor proofreading of sources: giving various spellings of the author's name or mis-matched years of publication. Using another style of citation instead of the requested one, for example, the Turabian style of citation (Author/page number) instead of the style requested here. This style is more appropriate for situations where you are making repeated references to large works, such as in textual criticism. In biological writing where citations of multiple, usually short, sources are the norm, the form is seldom used. |
|
F. The Most Common Error Completely ignoring this set of standards and turning in a paper styled like the last paper you turned in As I mentioned in the Introduction of this page, no style is right or wrong in the absolute sense. What I am trying to achieve is for you to learn to carefully heed the format requirements of each individual writing job. If you are reading this, it probably doesn't apply to you. |
|
IV. Plagiarism WHAT IS PLAGIARISM? Directly or indirectly quoting or using a source without attribution is called plagiarism PLAGIARISM IS UNACCEPTABLE. It is considered dishonest and a form of academic malpractice. Plagiarism in a final, edited paper will result in disciplinary action according to the standards and policies of ASMS. HOW TO AVOID PLAGIARISM Avoiding plagiarism is easy if you accept the concept that in the academic world as elsewhere, ideas are property. Each and every use of an idea or fact which is not original to you alone must be accompanied by a source citation giving credit to the author of the fact or idea. The only exception is knowledge that is truely common: the sky is blue. QUOTATION: If you use an author's exact words, you must acknowledge this fact by placing those words in quotation marks and following the quotation with a source citation. If you find it completely unavoidable to use a long direct quote, indicate it by indenting and single-spacing the passage, followed by a citation. Ex: "Direct quotes from your source must be inticated by quotation marks and a citation of the source of the quote" (Smith 1960). You should avoid lengthy direct quotes. If you find one absolutely necessary, indicate it by a special format:
PARAPHRASE: If you express an author's sense but use different words, this is called PARAPHRASE. Paraphrase is often misunderstood and is only acceptable if done correctly. Changing a few words here and there is not acceptable. If the overall order and organization of the thought is untouched, you do not have true paraphrase. In that case, preserve the exact words instead and make it a direct quote. Cite the source of the direct quote. True paraphrase involves taking the author's words and thoughts, learning and understanding them, and relating them in an original composition of your own. The author must STILL be cited as source of the facts or opinions expressed. POOR ACADEMIC PRACTICE: While not technically outright plagiarism, some students deliver papers which are properly sourced but which consist almost entirely of linked direct quotes and paraphrase. A work of scholarship involves SYNTHESIS. This means studying and assimilating the important sources and then writing a work in which the sources are used to advance and support an argument, point of view, or thesis. Your sources are merely the raw material of your scholarship, not the meat of the paper. COMMON PROBLEMS AND ERRORS WITH SOURCING AND PLAGIARISM Not citing a source for a fact or opinion which is the intellectual property of another. Not using quotation marks to indicate that you are quoting a source's exact words. Improper paraphrase: changing the words to avoid a direct quote but not achieving true paraphrase. Not providing sources for tables and figures not original to you. Submitting a paper which consists in large part of linked quotes and paraphrase.
|
|
V. Editing: Term Paper Checklist TERM PAPER CORRECTIONS
I apologise for the impersonality of a checklist.
I find that my students often make similar mistakes on their rough draft
term papers and it saves me a great deal of time if I don't have to
write and re-write the same explanations over and over by hand. |
|
TITLE PAGE no title page title page missing information: no title no name no date/course information ABSTRACT no abstract no heading (Abstract) no title on abstract page the abstract needs work. Please re-write.
THE BODY OF THE PAPER Margins and line spacing: margins are incorrect (1" margins, top, bottom, sides) indention is incorrect (first lines of paragraphs should be indented) spacing between lines, headings, paragraphs
is incorrect no title on the first page of the body too short: does not have the minimum number of pages Sources are not properly cited: NO source citations are given in the text Some facts in the text do not have source
citations citations in the text not included in the literature cited citations in the literature cited not included in the text citations do not follow the requested form The paper is disorganized: The paper is not divided into clear sections with headings for each section. You include too much info that is not applicable to your chosen subject You need to work on paragraph construction
and paper organization You need to work on fundamentals no figure or table given figure or table is not referred to at an appropriate
place in the body of the paper figure or table lacks a figure number (Figure 1) figure or table lacks a title figure or table lacks a caption LITERATURE CITED SECTION no literature cited section citations must be alphabetized citations are not given according to the required
form too few citations (five are required) citations are all books-journal articles are required too many internet sources-all sources should be books/journals. The only exception is that I allow your figure to come from an internet source, which must be included in the literature cited section some citations are unacceptable Other problems SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS The wording of your paper leads me to suspect that portions of it are copied directly from your sources or at least inadequately paraphrased. Please SEE ME about proper use of citations and academic honesty. If you feel that I am mistaken, I will be happy to hear your comments. Your paper is properly sourced, but consists
of a series of long direct quotes or paraphrases. This is unacceptable.
You must LEARN from your sources and combine the information into an
original composition. USE your sources to support your argument or explanation.
Don't rely on them to say it for you! ABSTRACTS An Abstract, on the other hand, is a condensed summary of the entire paper written in only a couple of hundred words or so. It must include the basic justification for the paper, state the central problem, subject or issue, give a very concise summary of the main facts of the case, and summarize any conclusions you reach. The test of a good abstract is: can a person reading the abstract only know what the paper is about and understand the most important and pertinent facts and conclusions of the paper? A good abstract is extremely specific and factual. The purpose of an abstract is for a busy scientist to be able to read it and judge whether the entire paper is worth his or her time. A SHORT LECTURE ON PARAPHRASE AND PLAGIARISM If you express an author's sense but use different words, it is STILL unacceptable if the overall order and organization of the thought is untouched. You MUST decide whether to make it a direct quote or turn it into a true, acceptable paraphrase. In either case you must cite the author as source. True paraphrase involves taking the author's words and thoughts, learning and understanding them, and relating them in an original composition of your own. The author must STILL be cited as source of the facts or opinions expressed. |
Return to [Genetics] [Cellular Biology] [Ecology] [Anatomy] [Botany] [Ornithology] [APBiology] [Evolution]